Why You Should Stop Reading About Peter Weller and Stop Talking About Peter Wells

The New York Times is an invaluable source for reporting on politics, but it’s also one of the most biased.

You’re going to get more out of this article if you take a step back and think about how biased it is.

For instance, when it comes to Peter Wellers politics, there’s no shortage of news outlets who treat him like a hero.

The New Yorker did a piece in April where they wrote that Weller “is the most powerful, charismatic and controversial politician in the country.”

When it comes down to it, the only thing that defines him is the fact that he’s an asshole.

Weller’s been called a “dumb bitch” and a “coward” and “a complete and total piece of shit,” among other things.

His latest, on Tuesday, was a series of tweets that took aim at the New York Daily News and other media outlets for their coverage of him.

The tweets are actually pretty funny, if not entirely true.

As well, the Times has been reporting on the allegations of sexual harassment by Weller for years, and they’re all based on accounts that have been corroborated.

The paper’s editors have acknowledged that there are many who think they know more about Weller than the paper actually does.

“We have to recognize that the media doesn’t really know,” editor Scott Shane wrote in an email.

“As journalists we have a responsibility to report on these stories, and this isn’t a perfect model.

The Times has done a good job.”

So what’s wrong with reporting on Weller?

Weller is a dick.

He’s a bully.

He doesn’t give a shit about anyone.

He thinks that everyone hates him because of his politics.

He has no respect for anyone.

His tweets are pretty funny if you read them.

The only thing you really need to know about Peter Welles politics is that he has an asshat problem.